| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • Work with all your cloud files (Drive, Dropbox, and Slack and Gmail attachments) and documents (Google Docs, Sheets, and Notion) in one place. Try Dokkio (from the makers of PBworks) for free. Now available on the web, Mac, Windows, and as a Chrome extension!

View
 

PhD Chat - Critical Thinking

Page history last edited by Steve Moss 10 years, 2 months ago Saved with comment

'Critical thinking skills for PhD students.'

 

#phdchat tweet log - 25th May 2011

 

@NSRiazat - Topic tonight for #phdchat (7.30pm-8.30pm BST) 'Critical thinking skills for PhD students.'

@JaneDavis13 - @NSRiazat I am excelling in the art of being critical just now ... Oh, you mean academically?

@JaneDavis13 - Just received my copy of "The Discovery of Grounded Theory" (Glaser & Strauss) and can't wait to read it .. Critically of course

@NSRiazat - @JaneDavis13 How did Ofsted go? 'The Discovery of Grounded Theory (Glaser & Strauss) is a useful text.

@NSRiazat - How can you persuade/argue EFFECTIVELY in the final thesis? How do people recognise and define 'arguments'?

@LBA_OX12 - Have been inspired to buy Wallace & Wray's book on critical thinking after it was recommended on #phdchat last week

@gawbul - Lol! @scottwdavis: @NSRiazat Good topic for .. plenty of folks are critical of my thinking skills. :)

@ScholarAtLarge - Good evening everyone! Great topic. I for one struggle on border of normative/critical thinking when making arguments

@sarahthesheepu - @NSRiazat that is a useful question & relates to viva performance as well its not just what u say but HOW u say it

@drjavafox - @NSRiazat I went to a brilliant summer school & listened to other students' presentations, to get an idea of what an 'argument' is

@NSRiazat - Am skilled at finding the arguments...just go round in circles after that...need to be selective and recognise important arguments.

@drjavafox - @NSRiazat that summer school literally saved my PhD. I also learned it's okay to talk to fellow students.

@SavvyOD - @ScholarAtLarge What do you mean by "normative?"

@NSRiazat - Agree @drjavafox listening to other phd students present work is a great way to see if you are swayed by their reasoning/argument.

@scottwdavis - @NSRiazat See if propositions and hypotheses are logically supported in the text. Make sure constructs are well-defined.

@C_J_Cage - Even Wikipedia seems unsure about the definition of critical thinking:

@NSRiazat - @sarahthesheepu My supervisor (@Janshs) says the same - not what you say but HOW you say it. :-)

@ScholarAtLarge - @SavvyOD 'normative' as in factual....as if I am simply retelling something and acknowledging it instead of critically engaging

@SavvyOD - my professor just told me Assertion + Evidence = Critical Thinking. I always try to remember that when I'm writing.

@drjavafox - @NSRiazat 1 of my primary arguments was circular... I didn't know what that meant & had to find out myself.

@laurapasquini - Research Skills required by PhD students, as defined by the UK Research Councils http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/2014

@NSRiazat - Good point @C_J_Cage ~ think 'critical thinking' means different things 2 different students in the context of their thesis themes.

@ScholarAtLarge - Good Formula. RT @SavvyOD: my professor just told me Assertion + Evidence = Critical Thinking.

@AndreaZellner - as a former writing teacher, often took Law & Order approach: assertion, evidence, address counterargument.

@SavvyOD - So how do we develop our thinking so that we are really critically thinking through the subject and not just retelling the story?

@NSRiazat - What does 'critical thinking mean to you? For me it's arguing, explaining and summarising as opposed to simply 'listing' thoughts.

@laurapasquini - I think it's also important to consider the definition of Critical Thinking http://bit.ly/jQUkAd How do you define it?

@nurcanileri - I think I need to know a lot to write in a critical manner, but feel confused about how to present it.

@AndreaZellner - as a student, I try to remember to situate myself in larger theoretical conversation. I get excited and forget.

@C_J_Cage - I'm a big fan of diagrams - linking your thought processes and identifying gaps

@laurapasquini - For me, critical thinking implies analysis and synthesis of information to make connections between ideas, theories and constructs.

@drjavafox - 'Critical thinking' to me means (among other things) telling why I like/don't like their argument.

@LBA_OX12 - Critical thinking = 2 dimensions - analysing UR reading & using in Ur writing?

@nurcanileri - @NSRiazat absolutely right, the author's voice needs to be heard!

@scottwdavis - Critical thinking should involve a thorough literature review so that contrary evidence, disputes, and gaps can be addressed.

@C_J_Cage - For me Critical Thinking is where you engage with the material - show how it links into your understanding/argument - +ve or -ve

@lizith - What does 'critical thinking mean to you? For me I think it has to do with engagement with the conceptual frameworks

@SavvyOD - My problem w/ CT is that I often don't know enough to really have an argument, one way or the other.

@allonsdanser - @NSRiazat I'm working on developing these skills right now. Argue, explain, summarize.

@merry30 - @SavvyOD Ditto. Or I THINK I don't know enough to really have an argument...

@ScholarAtLarge - i'm always afraid of just retelling the same overall story w/o applicability to my own writing when engaging with lit

@allonsdanser - @C_J_Cage I find mindmaps a good way to chart my thought progression through a topic. Makes it easy to elaborate on each item.

@C_J_Cage - One way is to find an article/argument you like/agree with then search for conflicting arguments to build your understanding  

@scottwdavis - Folks spend a lot of time providing evidence FOR arguments, but try arguing against them even if it doesn't make the manuscript.

@sarahthesheepu - @lizith for me it meant engaging with them and then looking at what their limitations are & arguing 4 alternatives or going beyond

@lizgloyn - @NSRiazat @drjavafox Also getting peers to read your work and see if they're swayed by *your* arguments - & what you need to add.

@SueFolley - @gawbul yeah I don't think critical thinking/writing comes naturally to me - it is a skill I am trying to develop :)

@laurapasquini - Critical thinking ... the L & O Approach. RT @AndreaZellner Law & Order approach: assertion, evidence, address counterargument.

@drjavafox - @lizith 'critical thinking' for me means arguing/telling what I do(n't) like/agree with about another's argument/assertion

@ClaretCarly - @gawbul @SueFolley Writing a manuscript helped me get better at synthesising & arguing because I had to summarise my thoughts

@C_J_Cage - @allonsdanser Yes mindmapping is a good way to see connections between thought threads

@drjavafox - I didn't think I was being 'critical', then told my supervisor why I wasn't using SO's theory & she said see? you're being critical

@laurapasquini - When do you apply your critical thinking skills the most? Research? Writing? Editing?

@lizgloyn - @NSRiazat t Outlining someone else's argument in your own words is a good way to engage critically & work through your own thoughts.

@scottwdavis - I watch visiting professors get ripped apart by our faculty and often wonder how they didn't consider the counterarguments raised.

@gawbul - @nurcanileri Me too! I tend to procrastinate with writing too much, whilst reading and trying to understand the whole picture

@NSRiazat - @C_J_Cage @allondanser ~ when I had the conceptual framework finally on a Excel document the connections became glaringly clear.

@SueFolley - @ClaretCarly what do you mean by a manuscript -do you mean a published paper? (sorry don't know what one is exactly)

@lizgloyn - Critical thinking is one of those buzz phrases that causes huge buzz words: everyone uses it, no one defines it.

@NSRiazat - Also hard to 'argue' with/against seasonsed experts/academics in the field...anyone?

@lizgloyn - First came across the problem in teaching; everyone says they want to teach critical thinking skills but don't say what that means.

@C_J_Cage - Yes, writing, presenting, getting your thoughts out into public, condensing them - makes you defend them!

@laurapasquini - True statement. RT @lizgloyn: Critical thinking is one of those buzz phrases...: everyone uses it, no one defines it.

@SavvyOD - There's also a fear of CT, that my "argument" may not make sense and I can't find evidence to back it up.

@ScholarAtLarge - practicing for my 1st year conference and running it by my supervisor helped me to clearly my critical thoughts on frameworks

@NSRiazat - I did that with my 'theoretical 'note-taking' whilst exploring the literature ~ helps to enagage with it @lizgloyn

@scottwdavis - @NSRiazat If you're going to argue with tenured faculty, you'd better know the literature & authors' names or they will kill you!

@SueFolley - I think it takes a certain amount of confidence in what you are saying to be critical of other authors, esp experts

@lizgloyn - @scottwdavis This is where having a group of peers to circulate work around first helps to highlight objections compassionately.

@C_J_Cage - @NSRiazat Instead of arguing against seasoned academics myself I try and find other seasoned academics who have to draw on

@naomi_jacobs - @SavvyOD I feel this way too. I have lots of ideas, but it can be extremely difficult to evaluate their worth realistically.

@SueFolley - @ClaretCarly Thanks for clarifying and yes I can see that would be good practice as you are writing for a public audience

@drjavafox - @NSRiazat I used to be intimidated thinking that I was qualified to argue against eminent scholars, but now I relish the challenge!

@gawbul - @allonsdanser My supervisor always tells me to draw things out, to see the bigger picture! Perhaps I should start using mind maps!?

@allonsdanser - @NSRiazat Can't the argument take the form of a question? Argument sounds aggressive.

@scottwdavis - @lizgloyn Agreed. You've got to have a lot of eyes on your work before you defend it.

@SavvyOD - @SueFolley I agree Sue, especially since we're just beginning our research in the field.

@drjavafox - @NSRiazat I think I'm at that point where I am closer to being a PhD than when I began, so am feeling more at home w academics

@lizgloyn - @SueFolley Criticism should come from knowing you're contributing something new/important, not just for criticism's sake.

@C_J_Cage - My supervisor made me write write write before really had a clear idea,but think it really helped my Critical Thinking skills

@NSRiazat - @drjavafox agree - have to put own arguments/thoughts and thinking out there to assure others of credibility of research.

@scottwdavis - @allonsdanser @NSRiazat If the argument takes the form of a question, are you leaving it to an empirical study?

@allonsdanser - @gawbul Love mindmaps, but don't sweat the how-tos. Just draw what works for you.

@NSRiazat - @gawbul @C_J_Cage Rejoinders to academics by other academics is a great way to challenge and clarify thinking.

@JeffreyKeefer - I think about critical thinking from the perspective of Stephen Brookfield: the process to uncover and check assumptions

@NSRiazat - @allonsdanser ~ meant 'argument' as in clear and definitive 'chain of thought' not aggression...

@SueFolley - @gawbul cool - so do you intend to publish? :) I do think that will focus your attention :)

@NSRiazat - @scottwdavis @allonsdaser ~ re: argument in form of question ~ depends on paradigms and methodology...thoughts?

@allonsdanser - @scottwdavis When challenging/arguing I was thinking use a question to introduce a different point.

@lizgloyn - Wd like to mention Rutgers' undergrad core learning goals - articulate products of critical thinking: http://bit.ly/iDvXFj [PDF]

@NPalopoli - Critical thinking is the ability to discern right from wrong, including reasons and trying to find out why, sometimes, you can't.

@lizgloyn - Obviously at the postgrad level you'd want more sophisticated products, but the application of skills helps clarify what CT means.

@gawbul - @laurapasquini I think equally so at all stages? Need to be critically focused during all stages!?

@ai1sa - @NSRiazat I totally agree, my methodology does not value being critical abut classical thesis seems to

@aeratcliffe - From Wallace and Wray, Argument = Conclusion + Warranting

@SueFolley - I think being critical is not just accepting something that is published is fact. You need to question and offer counter arguments

@scottwdavis - @NSRiazat @allonsdaser Yes. In my field, it's ok to leave it as an empirical Q if there's compelling evidence in both directions.

@ai1sa - rather than right from wrong, maybe bettter and worse for certain people or for certain times

@NSRiazat - @ai1sa Yes ~ was thinking it depends on paradigms and methodology.

@nelldarby - @SueFolley Yes. quite agree, you need to always question the information you're given.

@SueFolley - @nelldarby yes and something we sometimes forget to do, esp if the evidence agrees with our argument :)

@aeratcliffe - One of Brookfield's books (I have it) is Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher.

@gawbul - @SueFolley Yes, hopefully ready to submit by the end of the week! It's been a steep learning curve, but really focused my thinking!

@NSRiazat - @SueFolley agree if accepted all that was published as fact then would there any new knowledge contributed ~ defeats purpose of Phd

@allonsdanser - @JeffreyKeefer Uncover and check assumptions = presenting an argument.

@JeffreyKeefer - @lizith @LBA_OX12 Yes, he works with bringing critical theory to learning in adulthood. I studied with him; find his work energetic

@nelldarby - @SueFolley @NSRiazat But need to have well thought out reasons for disagreeing with those "facts" - based on good analysis.

@NSRiazat - Have lots of intermediate conlusions on the way, not critical, and then one main conclusion ~ this often leads me round in circles.

@allonsdanser - @NSRiazat I think that as @JeffreyKeefer points out, arguments are about uncovering & cking assumptions.

@ai1sa - synthesis; bringing together also is a way of thinking critically. Not always tearing apart, not always making something less....

@andycoverdale - For me, critical thinking needs to be disciplined and consistent...

@andycoverdale - not something you chose to turn on and off at will to suit agendas or reinforce assumptions

@JeffreyKeefer - @allonsdanser Perhaps, but I think it may first involve a struggle with things alone. Assumptions are often locked internally

@SavvyOD - @andycoverdale By consistent do you mean, that you use CT in every area, not just phd work?

@lizgloyn - #phdchat I often suspect critical thinking is one of those things one knows when one sees - hence so important to let others see your work.

@scottwdavis - So who uses a well-defined process for critical thinking in the context of academic research?

@NSRiazat - @JeffreyKeefer ~ challenging assumptions locked internally is critical point ~ we can never be totally objective?

@allonsdanser - @JeffreyKeefer True. I guess I would not argue unless I was familiar with the assumptions of the topic.

@lizgloyn - @NSRiazat Now we're into locating our own subject-positions, which is easier in some disciplines than in others.

@julialeventon - @NSRiazat @JeffreyKeefer I have recently been pointed towards lit. on positionality around this point.

@NSRiazat - @scottwdavis For me, finding supporting intermediate conclusions throughout the writing/analysis to develop a thorough argument  

@allonsdanser - @JeffreyKeefer I'm trying to imagine what CT looks like in the wild. Do you know it when you see it?

@JeffreyKeefer - @ai1sa You know, in this way critical thinking fits nicely with actor-network theory

@ai1sa - @NSRiazat @jeffreykeefer always inside the belly of the monster, always positioned (Donna Haraway)

@gawbul - @SavvyOD I use it in every aspect of my life now :-

@JeffreyKeefer - @allonsdanser I wonder if topics can hold assumptions, as opposed to those people who infuse them into the topics?

@ai1sa - @JeffreyKeefer in this way yes it does. hadnt realised latour & brookfield had a similarity there, but so does Foucault to a point

@NSRiazat - @scottwdavis 'R1 + R2 = IC = R3 = C' (the magic Phd critical writing theory ~ should bottle and patent it ;-)

@andycoverdale - @SavvyOD I think the discipline you learn from being critical can be usefully applied in other contexts

@NSRiazat - R1+R2=IC+R3=C (Reason 1 = Reason 2 = Intermediate conlusion + reason 3 = conlusion.)

@scottwdavis - @NSRiazat Are your intermediate conclusions moderators and mediators?

@JeffreyKeefer - @ai1sa I am not sure Brookfield and Latour would see a similarity; that is our job to put new things together in our research!

@kdrussaw - #phdchat RT @kdrussaw I offer "They Say/I Say" (can't remember author's name right now) to my students who str (cont)

@SavvyOD - @gawbul CT is kinda like 6Sigma Process Improvement. Once u learn it u see ways of improving processes all the time.

@NSRiazat - @scottwdavis re-phrase ~ not sure what you're asking me 'intermediate conclusions moderators/mediators'?

@ai1sa - @JeffreyKeefer similarity in as much as uncovering and checking assumptions

@allonsdanser - @scottwdavis I'd love to see examples of well-defined process for CT.

@scottwdavis - @NSRiazat Ex: hypothesize relationship between advertising and sales. May hypothesize about moderating and mediating variables 1st.

@lizgloyn - @allonsdanser #phdchat I think a well-defined CT process is the magic unicorn of teaching/research - rarely sighted and probably fictional.

@ai1sa - i used to be a critical social theorist but then went ANT I now have to reign in my tendency to shred things

@NSRiazat - @scottwdavis Using Grounded Theory so mosty theorising comes mainly from data ~ use theory to back up/dispute/challenge findings.

@allonsdanser - @NSRiazat Agree.This is what we were taught as a post-positivist point of view via Nicholas Burbules text on postpositivism.

@LBA_OX12 - @gawbul Can U define a CT process? Is there more than 1?

@scottwdavis - @NSRiazat So you're using an inductive approach?

@sarahthesheepu - which for a critical realist is a bit weird i suppose?!

@NSRiazat - @scottwdavis But you're right ~ can lead to hypothesising relationshp between variables. Trying to back up with data when possible.

@C_J_Cage - I think Critical Thinking, as with the learning experience is a cycle a bit like this: http://t.co/raSTJvA

@scottwdavis - You can think critically forever about a topic. At some point you've got to conduct an analysis.

@C_J_Cage - or perhaps more like: read, absorb, interpret, read more, compare, criticise. Something like that?

@lizgloyn - @C_J_Cage Which highlights important point - you can't think critically without wide-ranging knowledge of your field.

@NSRiazat - Emergence of themes/categories from the data as opposed to forcing data into categories @scottwdavis

@aeratcliffe - @allonsdanser Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

@ai1sa - @lizith sometimes doesnt need wide ranging kn; if an argument is inconsistent, or generalizationn can be refuted on a test case

@NSRiazat - @scottwdavis @janeDavis13 ~ Glaserian approach fits better as opposed to Straussian. Initially preferred Straussian but changed.

@allonsdanser - @NSRiazat From whom does this formula originate? Sounds interesting.

@JaneDavis13 - @NSRiazat @scottwdavis I can see bits of both working

@NSRiazat - what is your field? Mine is perceptions and actions as a result so quite subjective so have to allow themes of emerge @scottwdavis

@lizgloyn - @aeratcliffe Ta for the cite. I've heard good things about Schon's Reflective Practitioner too, tho haven't yet read it.

@scottwdavis - @NSRiazat Marketing/Consumer Behavior. Plenty of deductive reasoning before it goes to the lab.

@ai1sa - what i find hard is writers who keep writing & change their minds, staying up to date with alive people is difficult,

@C_J_Cage - Was trying to remember something someone showed me: Bloom's Taxonomy: http://t.co/FhZAPwl I still think it's more like a circle

@NSRiazat - @allonsdanser Trying to make sure I put reasons for thoughts (either from data/literature/academics/theory etc) hence reasons.

@NSRiazat - I looked into Abductive and Inductive...read a little around Deductive. @scottwdavis

@C_J_Cage - Going up the cognitive levels with Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive domain: http://t.co/FhZAPwl

@allonsdanser - #phdchat @NSRiazat I like it. It's better than anything I've heard & gets u out of the listing/circling pattern.

@merry30 - @NSRiazat Yes, it needs to be very reflective doesn't it? Thick and transparent at the same time...!

@nurcanileri - I remember I was less critical when I first started PhD.You need to learn the research area to learn to look from different angles

@ai1sa - @aeratcliffe my lit review critiques Schons Refl Prac . well @ least describes & points 2 some limits on how people get positioned

@nurcanileri - @ai1sa I agree, and sometimes find hard to be fully aware of their thinking.

@ai1sa - @nurcanileri and for me the reverse was true...i think i now am open to more depth and breadth

@aeratcliffe - Someone recently recommended, How to Read a Book: The classic guide to intelligent reading. I now have, but another to read later.

@NSRiazat - Definitely gives you a 'hook' for the writing of the analysis/literature review chapters. @NSRiazat

@allonsdanser - @sarahthesheepu It is a great convo today! How did u operationalize CT when u were writing/prepping?

@gawbul - @LBA_OX12 I think it's important to try & see the bigger picture & understand all factors when evaluating & building the argument!

@NSRiazat - @allondanser Definitely gives you a 'hook' for the writing of the analysis/literature review chapters.

@gawbul - @C_J_Cage I agree! Constant feedback and adjustment! Crap if you're a perfectionist :-

@ai1sa - i like using my blog for practicing critique, sometimes it even pulls the writers i have talked of out into the open :)

@lizgloyn - #phdchat OOI, how many people's supervisors explicitly mention CT? None of my teachers ever did; first encountered it in teaching objectives

@aeratcliffe - When I think of CT, I think of Jenny Moon. Used to refer to her materials when trying to teach students

@aeratcliffe - ...that is when trying to teach students about CT and reflective writing

@ai1sa - A last thought on CT, 4 now, : To bring somethings into the light is also to push some things into the shadow (Bruno Latour )

@gawbul - @ai1sa I need to start doing that some more! My supervisor actually recommended it!

@NSRiazat - Kelle http://goo.gl/hAUFE

@allonsdanser - @lizgloyn Mine do! All the time. They seem to be explicitly trying to get us to engage in CT.

@lizgloyn - @allonsdanser #phdchat Mine wanted me to produce artefacts that demonstrated CT, but never used the CT jargon, which is why I ask.

@NSRiazat - Maybe training is needed in CT for PhD students by home institutions...I think it is something that we just often left to discover?

@SavvyOD - @NSRiazat It should be a course taught in school...at some point, and the sooner, the better.

@lizgloyn - @NSRiazat That would mean institutions knowing how to define it in the first place #oldcynic

@JeffreyKeefer - @allonsdanser Great question. In the wild, I think critical thinking looks like somebody who listens and acknowledges differences

@JeffreyKeefer - @julialeventon @NSRiazat Tell us more about your new area of lit inquiry.

@JeffreyKeefer - @NSRiazat No, I do not think we can be objective. Fair, yes; without experience, no.

@Rabourn - I just ordered "They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing." Looks like what I need. Thx for mentioning it @kdrussaw

@allonsdanser - @JeffreyKeefer post #Phdchat reflection re postpositivism & actor network theory has opened a new door in my mind.World building is complex

@clrsimple2 - @Rabourn @kdrussaw I just ordered they say/i say - looks great!! TY!

@JeffreyKeefer - @nurcanileri Yes; learning to see things from different angles is quite a challenge. I have know PhDs who never learned that.

@JeffreyKeefer - Somebody in #phdchat mentioned the book "They Say / I Say" http://amzn.to/mMtlqD today. Was it recommended?

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.